Difference between revisions of "Marcellin Boule"
WikiadminBot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles) |
WikiadminBot (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles *** existing text overwritten ***) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| birth_date = 1861 | | birth_date = 1861 | ||
| death_date = 1942 | | death_date = 1942 | ||
| − | | address = Museum National d'Hisotire Naturelle, 3 Place Valhubert, Paris | + | | address = Museum National d'Hisotire Naturelle, 3 Place Valhubert, Paris<br />Museum National d'Histoire Naturell, Paris, 57 Rue Cuvier, 5e [1933] |
| − | | occupation = | + | | occupation = palaeontologist<br />prehistorian |
| elected_ESL = | | elected_ESL = | ||
| elected_ASL = | | elected_ASL = | ||
| − | | elected_AI = 1911 | + | | elected_AI = 1911.12.12 |
| elected_APS = | | elected_APS = | ||
| elected_LAS = | | elected_LAS = | ||
| membership = Hon. Fellow | | membership = Hon. Fellow | ||
| − | | left = | + | | left = 1942 deceased |
| clubs = | | clubs = | ||
| societies = | | societies = | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
=== House Notes === | === House Notes === | ||
| − | 1922 HML L’oeuvre anthropologique du Prince Albert 1er de Monaco et les récents progrès de la Paléontologie humaine en France Not delivered, as Prof. MB was unable, under doctor’s orders, to visit England in the autumn. The medal has been forwarded | + | 1911.11.28 The following were nominated for election as Honorary Fellows: Padre Schmidt, Dr Köhler, Dr Pigorini and Prof. Boule<br />1922 HML L’oeuvre anthropologique du Prince Albert 1er de Monaco et les récents progrès de la Paléontologie humaine en France Not delivered, as Prof. MB was unable, under doctor’s orders, to visit England in the autumn. The medal has been forwarded<br />death noted in the report of the council 1942-43<br />obit. Man XLIII, 24 |
=== Notes From Elsewhere === | === Notes From Elsewhere === | ||
Marcellin Boule (1 January 1861 – 4 July 1942) was a French palaeontologist.<br />He studied and published the first analysis of a complete Neanderthal specimen. The fossil discovered in La Chapelle-aux-Saints was an old man, and Boule characterized it as brutish, bent kneed and not a fully erect biped.[1] In an illustration he commissioned, the Neanderthal was characterized as a hairy gorilla-like figure with opposable toes, according to a skeleton which was already distorted with arthritis. As a result, Neanderthals were viewed in subsequent decades as being highly primitive creatures with no direct relation to anatomically modern humans. Later re-evaluations of the La Chapelle-aux-Saints skeleton have roundly discredited Boule's initial work on the specimen.[2]<br />He was one of the first to argue that eoliths were not manmade.[3]<br />Boule also expressed some scepticism about the "Piltdown man" discovery — later revealed to be a hoax. As early as 1915, Boule recognized that the jaw belonged to an ape rather than an ancient human.[4] However, the Piltdown forgery has been characterised as providing evidential support for Boule's "branching evolution" conclusions drawn from his Neanderthal research — research which is likewise said to have "prepar[ed] the international community for the appearance of a non-Neanderthal fossil such as Piltdown Man.<br /> | Marcellin Boule (1 January 1861 – 4 July 1942) was a French palaeontologist.<br />He studied and published the first analysis of a complete Neanderthal specimen. The fossil discovered in La Chapelle-aux-Saints was an old man, and Boule characterized it as brutish, bent kneed and not a fully erect biped.[1] In an illustration he commissioned, the Neanderthal was characterized as a hairy gorilla-like figure with opposable toes, according to a skeleton which was already distorted with arthritis. As a result, Neanderthals were viewed in subsequent decades as being highly primitive creatures with no direct relation to anatomically modern humans. Later re-evaluations of the La Chapelle-aux-Saints skeleton have roundly discredited Boule's initial work on the specimen.[2]<br />He was one of the first to argue that eoliths were not manmade.[3]<br />Boule also expressed some scepticism about the "Piltdown man" discovery — later revealed to be a hoax. As early as 1915, Boule recognized that the jaw belonged to an ape rather than an ancient human.[4] However, the Piltdown forgery has been characterised as providing evidential support for Boule's "branching evolution" conclusions drawn from his Neanderthal research — research which is likewise said to have "prepar[ed] the international community for the appearance of a non-Neanderthal fossil such as Piltdown Man.<br /> | ||
Latest revision as of 06:24, 22 January 2021
Contents
Notes
Office Notes
House Notes
1911.11.28 The following were nominated for election as Honorary Fellows: Padre Schmidt, Dr Köhler, Dr Pigorini and Prof. Boule
1922 HML L’oeuvre anthropologique du Prince Albert 1er de Monaco et les récents progrès de la Paléontologie humaine en France Not delivered, as Prof. MB was unable, under doctor’s orders, to visit England in the autumn. The medal has been forwarded
death noted in the report of the council 1942-43
obit. Man XLIII, 24
Notes From Elsewhere
Marcellin Boule (1 January 1861 – 4 July 1942) was a French palaeontologist.
He studied and published the first analysis of a complete Neanderthal specimen. The fossil discovered in La Chapelle-aux-Saints was an old man, and Boule characterized it as brutish, bent kneed and not a fully erect biped.[1] In an illustration he commissioned, the Neanderthal was characterized as a hairy gorilla-like figure with opposable toes, according to a skeleton which was already distorted with arthritis. As a result, Neanderthals were viewed in subsequent decades as being highly primitive creatures with no direct relation to anatomically modern humans. Later re-evaluations of the La Chapelle-aux-Saints skeleton have roundly discredited Boule's initial work on the specimen.[2]
He was one of the first to argue that eoliths were not manmade.[3]
Boule also expressed some scepticism about the "Piltdown man" discovery — later revealed to be a hoax. As early as 1915, Boule recognized that the jaw belonged to an ape rather than an ancient human.[4] However, the Piltdown forgery has been characterised as providing evidential support for Boule's "branching evolution" conclusions drawn from his Neanderthal research — research which is likewise said to have "prepar[ed] the international community for the appearance of a non-Neanderthal fossil such as Piltdown Man.
Publications
External Publications
House Publications
Oeuvre anthrop. du Prince de Monaco [Huxley Lecture] 1922
